Friday, January 24, 2014

More on choosing a DSLR

See some of my pics on flickr at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/randymorter/

I can't claim to be any where near an expert on the cameras that are available, and I had even less knowledge back in August 2013 when I started researching them. I turned to the interweb. There is a lot of info out there about buying your first DSLR. I did googles such as "best entry level dslr" and got lots of hits.

Now, 5 months later, I am not sure what sites or pages I read. And to make it more interesting, there are new models out since I was looking into this. Here's one page that still has info that was more applicable to the August 2013 time frame, provided as an example:

http://photo.net/equipment/entry-level-dslrs/

In it are the following tidbits of info that is still pertinent:
All of these cameras will produce excellent images under typical shooting conditions. With sensors much larger than any P&S camera they will capture images that can be used to make larger prints with lower noise. If you just want good images shooting in good light, they will all do a good job.

"Factors to consider might be that Nikon and Canon probably have the largest line of available lenses and accessories, plus all the 3rd party lens makers make their lenses in Nikon and Canon mounts. Both Nikon and Canon put image stabilization in their lenses rather than in the body and the best IS lenses probably offer a little better stabilization than you can get with the stabilization in the body (which Sony and Pentax use)."
Other web sites had similar, non-committal information, again leaving you almost as confused as when you start looking into this.
 
But the bottom line is, they all produce good pictures. The feature set is different. I didn't have any idea what features I'd be interested in so that was kind of a wash. The more I looked into things the more I realized I probably couldn't go wrong with a Canon or Nikon. The other brands might be interesting but if you look at enough articles you'll see that people who shoot for National Geographic, Arizona Highways Magazine, weddings or other significant events, are likely using either a Canon or Nikon.
 
I kind of stumbled into Nikon just because of a sale that was happening at the Avondale Best Buy. I don't regret it, but I doubt if I'd regret it if I'd got Canon either.
 
One thing I can say at this point is that if you want a sharper picture with the best quality, you need to step up to the "full frame" camera such as a Nikon D610. But along those lines, if "bigger is better", and referring to the actual image sensor, Nikon cameras have a slightly larger sensor than the Canon cameras (1.5x vs. 1.6x respectively).
 
And, at this point, I have to say that after getting my camera, I found a guy online that I have appreciated for his informational books. I've read some other books too that I'll mention later but this guy is pertinent at this point.
 
I've bought a couple of Tony Northrup e-books (for my Kindle, which I'll also talk about later). One of the books (and the 2nd one I got) is his book on buying equipment. Tony (not that I know him personally, but I'll use this familiar name) is a pro photographer and writes about photography, as does his wife Chelsea. I like his writing and his books are VERY reasonably priced. In addition, he provides lifetime updates to his e-books. I've only had his books for a few months and I've already got updates including info about new equipment, techniques, etc.
 
He also has an active and private Facebook community group that you automatically get access to after purchasing his book. He reviews images as do the other members and you can get a lot of info about your pics that you post or about other pics.
 
Okay, back to the subject at hand, one of Tony's books is called "Tony Northrup's Photography Buying Guide: How to Choose a Camera, Lens, Tripod, Flash, & More". It's packed with up to date info about equipment that's actually in the stores and that he's actually used and compared to what he uses "on the job". Great info. At the time I'm writing this, the e-book is $8.99. This is a great resource to use when figuring out what to get. I wish I'd known about it before I made my purchases. Not that I'd have changed anything but at least I'd have been more confident that I was doing the right thing.
 
Disclaimer: I'm in no way affiliated with Tony, nor do I get any kick-back from him. I'm just a fan and like his writing and level of information.
 
Disclaimer #2: Regarding the buying guide, it DOES assume you have some knowledge about photography. In other words, this book/guide does NOT always explain a lot about why you might want a feature or how to use it. His other book that I bought, "Stunning Digital Photography" is a great resource for that.
 
Another option, which I didn't take, is to go to a local camera store and take lessons, possibly renting different camera models. I toyed with this idea but didn't feel it would provide much more clarification than I was getting online. Plus, my wife and I had just done that process last year when getting into firearms. That may be a bit different because different firearms feel different in you grip but the actual round being fired still likely punches holes in paper targets about the same. (By the way, that's another hobby we sunk money into and lost a lot of interest in after a few months).
 
I also want to mention another guy and his site which I find interesting. Sometimes the guy is abrasive but I also think he cuts to the chase and has some good info. I'm talking about Ken Rockwell, of course. Here's a link to his comparison between Canon vs. Nikon. He's got some cool info about the 2 companies.

And again, I'm not automatically saying that Canon and Nikon are the best. But I do think they're the biggest in DSLR offerings. There's a new Sony out that's quite something though, and if you don't really want the full DSLR, there are a lot of cool options available from a number of manufacturers. I used to really like my little Pentax 35mm film camera back in the 1980's.

In the end, the more you research the more you'll find out about the choices. All of the entry level DSLR cameras are going to probably be fine. But at some point you have to make a choice and actually buy one. You may end up finding out you want a different one, which is a good reason not to spend too much. A good camera will probably sell used for 1/2 of what you pay for it. You just need to bite the bullet and get you one! Take some pictures! Find out what kind of photography or subjects turn you on! Have some fun!

Thursday, January 23, 2014

My first DSLR and why

See some of my pics on flickr at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/randymorter/

Deciding to buy a DSLR is the easy part. Deciding which one, as a new purchase without any existing photography equipment, is the the hard part.

In fact, there are other formats besides the "standard" DSLR (micro four-thirds, mirrorless, large format). I chose to get a DSLR, well, because that's what I wanted. I can't afford the larger formats (especially for a hobby, which I'll get into more in a bit...). I wanted to use the view finder because that just seemed like real photography to me.

My fate was sealed - it was going to be a DSLR. There are a few name brands and it only takes a bit of googling to find out which ones are the most popular. The usual suspects are Canon, Nikon, and somewhat lesser, and in no particular order, Sony, Pentax, and some others that are either small players or expensive (like Lieca). Some of the non-Canon or Nikon cameras have some cool features too.

But, for me, it was a decision between the 2 big boys - Canon and Nikon. If you research that discussion on the web you'll find an endless supply of opinions. It's confusing and correspondingly hard to come to a decision.

First, I had to come up with a reasoned budget. I decided to stick to an entry level camera system, around $500 or so. My reason, which may not apply to anyone else, is that I've started a few other hobbies in my life, studied them, subscribed to magazines, and most importantly, sunk money into them.

Other Hobbies

I've stuck with some of my hobbies for a good number of years, such as music. I started playing guitar in 1970 and still play. I ran a small commercial recording studio for 10 years. I sold all of that equipment in the 1990's but in the 2000's I started accumulating more recording equipment. Today I have a dozen guitars and basses (the pic at right shows some of them), multiple keyboards, a drum set and percussion, and in some ways more recording equipment than I had in the 1980's and 1990's. I appear to be sticking to that hobby (although my interest ebbs and flows at times to make room for other interests, like most people).

I also used to be into sport bikes, including a time when I had 2 of them simultaneously. I also used to fish a lot. I don't do either of those things any longer (but I MAY go fishing again if the right opportunity presented itself).

I used to give guitar lessons and always recommended to parents or students that they get the best instrument they could afford, or even spend a bit more than that. My reason was that the quality will be better (as long as you buy from a reputable dealer). Better quality meant the student would enjoy the results more - the timbre would be better, it would likely be easier to play and would tune and stay in tune better. And, if the student doesn't stick with it and they decided to sell the instrument they'd get a better re-sale value. I've never seen where that wasn't the case.

How does that apply to a camera? Well, directly...

Photography Hobby Deliberations

I wasn't sure (and still am not) how long I'd keep an interest in photography. I decided to be tentative. I wanted a camera that would do the cool DSLR type things (fully manual picture taking) so that was the minimum - an entry level DSLR. I figured that I'd know within a year or so the extent of my interest in photography. If I was a flaming fanatic I'd get a more expensive camera in a year or so. Otherwise I'd have a decent camera that I could still take some better pictures with as compared to our Kodak Z7590. Either way we'd make out. (By "we" I mean my "empty-nester" wife and I).

So, it was going to be an entry level Canon or Nikon.

I read the reviews of the entry level cameras including the Nikon D3200 (the D3300 wasn't out at that time). The bottom line of all I could read online was that all of the cameras in that price range were very similar and they all shoot really good pictures. I looked at a lot of sample pictures from both cameras too. To be honest, I don't remember the Canon that I was comparing to the Nikon D3200, but to me the colors and sharpness of the Nikon pics were more impressive.

Another information source I had was a number of friends that shoot photos too, and almost all of them had chosen Nikon and were happy with their choice.

My Nikon D3200

Coupled with that info, I decided to take a trip to Best Buy and lo and behold if they didn't have a sale going on right then on Nikon equipment so that was the final choice for me - price. There have been better deals since, but I got a Nikon D3200 with the kit lens, an additional 55-200mm zoom, 16G SD Card (I didn't realize you had to get that separately), a camera bag, a DVD on the D3200, and probably some other stuff. It was a good sized bag! With tax it was about $900. So much for the $500 budget!

I had looked at prices online for the gear and the deal at Best Buy was a saving over Amazon or other places. I later found out that Costco actually had a better deal - I don't have a current membership there and never thing to look at them. It would have been cheaper for me to renew their membership and get the gear from them!

But, Nikon was having a sale (which I've seen often since August 2013) where if you bought a camera you got a good price on accessories like zoom lenses and flashes. That's why I got the 55-200mm zoom at the same time.

Best Buy had a special on the camera bag bundled with the SD card, DVD, and other accessories.

In addition, I added an extended warranty. I don't usually do that but I planned to try to take pictures of landscape an who knows what might happen to the gear.

I ended up with a Nikon D3200. I have NOT regretted it yet although at this point, after about 5 months with it, I want more. I am pretty sure which way this hobby is headed - down the road that involves a long time passion and along with it, additional expense!







Friday, January 17, 2014

Welcome to my blog!

See some of my pics on flickr at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/randymorter/

Hi and welcome to my first blog...

I recently picked up the photography hobby (in August, 2013). I've really been enjoying it and decided to start sharing what I've learned and what excites me about photography. I doubt if I've got anything revolutionary for long time photographers, but regardless, I'm blogging away anyway!

I'm going to post info about the equipment I've picked up and why, and I'll post pictures too. To get started, however, I'm going to explain what led me to photography.



Near Oak Creek
Near Manzanita Campground on Oak Creek
North of Sedona, AZ
 

Why I chose photography as a hobby

I used to fish. I fished a lot until I broke my foot in 2006. I fished from the lake banks and my broken foot prevented me from getting up and down the banks. When it healed enough, after a couple of months (that's another story...), I headed up to Catfish Point below Horseshoe Dam on the Verde River near Phoenix, AZ.

I liked fishing and missed it while my foot was out of commission. I liked getting out of the city, being in the quiet outdoors. I liked taking my dog Alvin, casting a line and working it or letting the rig dangle below a bobber. I'd take some nice cigars and a flask of whiskey. I'd try out things I'd read in Bassmaster magazine. It was an excellent way to clear my mind and soul at the end of the work week.

I had done primarily catch and release fishing in Arizona, catching large mouth bass, striped bass, catfish, sunfish, and trout (I did keep some trout). On my return to Catfish Point, I hooked into a smallish cat. When I landed it, it was making a moaning noise. I'd never heard that before from other catches and it just struck me that what I was doing was probably not much fun for the fish.

It struck me that the fish probably didn't like finding what they thought was something to eat only to end up with a jerk (take that however you want) from the food, a sharp poke in a lip, being drug through the water against their will, being lifted out of the water, their environment, struggling to breathe while out of water, having some large creature pull on the sharp thing stuck in their jaw, and then being thrown back in the water.

Call me slow if you want; I had thought about what I was doing to the fish before this particular incident. This time I heard a fish make noise and it was plainly obvious the noise wasn't that it was happy.

I packed up my stuff and left and haven't fished since. I might fish again someday, if I'm going to take the fish, but not just for my own sadistic benefit.

So...

I got into writing and recording music after that, as well as wood working. I still do those things too, but for the last year or more I've been wanting to do something that had a reason to be outdoors. Sure, there's camping and hiking or other things but I wanted more.

I have to admit also that I seem to have a fondness for technical things. A year and a half ago I got a drum set with the thought that I might learn to play it, but mainly so I could have a friend over to jam with me and he wouldn't have to drag a drum kit over. Plus, I wanted to record live drums - a challenge technically AND a need to buy some electronics and software!

I've thought about photography off and on over last year or more and this last August (2013) I went for it.

Photography combines technology with artistry. It is on the surface a fairly simple concept (at least now that some one else has figured out how to do everything) of capturing light on a sensor (film or digital) that's in focus and represents the image as close as possible in color and intensity. Finding and composing the image involves the artistry, at least if you are trying to do more than just a snapshot.

But you can get very deep into the technology very quickly. That seems to pique my interest.

It also gives me a reason to be outdoors, to travel, to camp. It gives me something to do when I'm outdoors that I enjoy - figuring out how to get a good image or to control the camera to get what I think is an "artsy" image such as a long exposure of moving water.

I'd had some years of experience earlier shooting video as well, and my father is/was a film photographer. I'd been exposed to composition, white balance, and other aspects of capturing images. It seemed like a good fit - I just pondered it about a year before taking the plunge to get a fully functional DSLR (Digital Single-Lens Reflex).

The final impetus was taking what I called a "drive about" in late July while on vacation for my birthday. I took my wife's Kodak camera and shot a lot of pictures of some of northern Arizona including Canyon de Chelly.

I really enjoyed the trip and taking the pictures and my wife liked seeing them when I got back. I posted some on Facebook and friends and family enjoyed them too. Basically I'd found something that I could do that I could share the results of and get positive responses to, plus I enjoyed the results, the technology, and being outdoors again. I was hooked!

After convincing my wife that I should spend some money on a new hobby (especially since the drum set had been quiet for a while), I started my research into what camera to get...



FYI - the picture above is from the first outing I took after getting my DSLR, one of the first shots with my new camera. It's an untouched jpeg (other than resizing). It may not be the best picture in the world but I still don't think it's bad. In fact, I like it and the others from that trip because it was the start of a new adventure with a new hobby at a new campground on a beautiful late summer day. Near Manzanita Campground, north of Sedona, AZ.